First I got an email telling me of a fail event detected on my RAID
device. Then 12 minutes later a second email this time from SMART
monitoring complaining that one of my hard drives could not be opened.
There is a difference between a failed to open device and a failed
So I verified these situations with the terminal. I verified the SMART
#smartctl -a /dev/questionable-device
I verified the status of the RAID array.
#mdadm --detail /dev/md0
I have a degraded array, one device is removed and faulty. The device is
/dev/sdd. This is the 1TB hard
drive which is the oldest of the 4 I'm using.
I opened the black box. I pulled the SATA cables and examined them for
anything out of the ordinary. I put them back again. I opened the
terminal to check if I have access to the hard drives.
#smartctl -a /dev/all-the-drives
I added the faulty drive to the RAID array with:
#mdadm --manage --add /dev/md0 /dev/faulty-drive
I checked the status of the RAID array.
donato@desktop:~$ cat /proc/mdstat
Personalities : [raid6] [raid5] [raid4] [linear] [multipath] [raid0]
md0 : active raid5 sdd sdb1 sdc1
1953260544 blocks super 1.2 level 5, 512k chunk, algorithm 2 [3/2]
[=====>...............] recovery = 26.4% (257972512/976630272)
bitmap: 6/8 pages [24KB], 65536KB chunk
unused devices: <none>
I guess this time it's for real. The RAID array is rebuilding itself.
Back to my monitoring station then.
When you're facing a white, blank screen trying to decide what to write, it seemed hopeless and hopeful at the same time. It's like...
Hi Reese I reinstalled ubuntu 16.04 yesterday. I was able to use the live usb I have of Xenial. So that bit of paranoia saved my skin...
I've been obsessed with sharing my desktop files over the home network to all the devices connected to my home router. I finally ...
I notice many Ubuntu forum members are asking about this. If you're using Gmail you should be familiar with messages viewed as conversa...